Do “free energy” devices require radiation?
对我来说很明显，我们已经听到了，我们已经听过，阅读和研究的所有自由能量设备，这会产生可用的实际功率，以便有一些组件或元素含有或暴露于放射性或放射性元件。
If this is true it probably is also the reason why replication is impossible without knowing that the device contained radioactive material, or was required to be exposed to radioactive material. Especially if this fact was purposely kept secret or suppressed.
This raises a number of important questions that encompasses all facets of the research we do in the present world we live in.
是腰的时间、精力和金钱,researchi吗ng theories and devices that do not have links with radioactivity when your goal is to make a device that produces real useable power? (Please remember that radioactivity is an electrical phenomenon)
我们都知道放射性衰变可以直接转换为电力，但您需要大量的电量。可以在特定设备中的其他元素或组件上使用少量放射性，以使这些元素或组件产生大量的能量？可以需要使用静电场或磁场脉冲。
是否有可能在放射性背后的灌输歇斯斯特飓风在高水平的高水平中，这些功率是为了能源生产的无害放射性物质的实验不会进行？
Is the availability of relatively harmless radioactive substances to the private researcher kept purposely out of reach to prevent free energy from getting into the hands of the public and as a result, loss in revenue to the power & oil companies and also to the governments ability to control you?
请记住，铀矿是一种天然的物质，自然地存在于世界各地，并在诸如核弹和核反应堆等可怕的事情中进行开采和转换，这为环境产生了令人震惊的废物。
What if we could take this natural and harmless uranium ore and place it in our free energy devices without converting it to anything terrible. We would no longer have any need for nuclear reactors. Third world and poorer nations would have free power and there would be less threat of war and needing to defend ourselves with nuclear weapons.
在我看来，这将是环境和人性的更好的选择。
But somehow I don’t think the powers that be would like this idea. When you think about it, to change the world like this now would be like taking every dollar, from the people in power, and converting it to one watt of energy in your free energy device. I think that’s how they see it anyway, and that’s all they care about.
