Ecological nuclear energy for the home
I have forced myself to write this article to shape my practical experiences that I have made about nuclear energy to the order of many people whom have requested for me to make references of the case.
核能是一个受到严重聚焦和从时代开始繁琐的受试者，从发现辐射和由芝麻，铀和所有在技术中衍生的实验的实验非常重要复杂，成本高，危险，产生污染副产品。是什么使得这种单一能量可能的是它只可用于可以支付此类费用的国家。此外，从来没有这种形式的能量可用于带到家里或用它来推动汽车或以在提到之前以相同的原因为我们的房屋喂养发电机，但我们关注我们巨大的崩解过程和巨大的崩解过程在地球上到处都是核反应我们在这里看到，如果系统可以进行核简单，生态和非常便宜。
诸如电放电，闪电等的常见发生，产生核反应，其还包括简单地发生在电路中的过程。如果我们可以设计一条在稳定的形式和控制的自身内产生核反应的电路，一切都是确定的。
我们不需要寻找铀，钚等的困难的事物和危险的事情......如果我们观看我们星球中发生的自发的核反应，我们将看到放射性因素与可能的方式相同最丰富的行星之一，这是碳，纯煤是非常容易获得的东西，我们在大自然中看到的核反应更典型的核反应涉及碳。当碳被碳在核聚变中被电子轰击时，被吸引到碳原子的细胞核中，以在以下反应中形成硼：
当碳变换成硼时，电子必须在数千个电子伏的级别内出现电能时，一旦形成硼，就会看到硼原子是不稳定的同位素，因此再次崩解以使自身变换回到稳定中。该反应原理的碳原子：
电子发射或回馈。现在，我通过β粒子的象征来说明，因为能量从核心叶子的能量，其最初是更大的，不再是数千千元的电子伏，但现在在1300万电子中是极端的。- 楼梯范围，也就是说，数千次的能量来启动反应，可以捕获这些β射线的巨大能量，例如，在环形中，从而获得核过程的即时电能需要中间过程。
反应1和2是可逆反应，因为碳一旦转化为硼返回以重建以启动无限期的循环，后来放弃比前者更高的能量，但由于过量的能量对应于储存而不会破坏任何保守定律原子内的内部能量导致物质转化为能量，这可以说明。
对珀耳斯on who does not understand; as if we went to a zoo and we threw a peanut to an elephant, then the elephant takes the peanut and returns it to the thrower with the power of his trunk with many times greater energy, this is the same. In addition to this fact, one knows that of each 100,000 carbon atoms that are bombarded with electrons only 1 enters the reversible reaction that it gives us. I calculate that 8KW of power is available per gram of transformed carbon. It is not necessary to resupply the system with coal because the system regenerates, but after a certain time it is advisable to change the coal source which is subject to wearing down. Not only is light and heat generated from all nuclear reactions but electrons are also freed.
实际实施：
How then we can accelerate electrons and shoot them into coal so that it will catch electrons in the form of beta radiation? Very simply, we obtain a pure coal bar and discharge a condenser into it, depends on the capacity of the condenser and of the voltage of the energy of discharge required for the reaction in equation 1 will be reached. All we know that when we discharge a condenser, especially in a short circuit through a coal bar, very high currents will take place that guarantee a high electron flow to favor greater collisions, and it is that simple, nothing of nuclear reactors, systems of cooling, pumps of high vacuum, only a simple electrical circuit will transform the nuclear energy released directly into electricity since the same emitted beta radiation is captured and stopped to feed an electrical load, which makes it more efficient than a nuclear system of a power station. For example; in which the reactor warms up the water for in the end with the pressure of that steam moving a turbine and generating electricity, we did not need any intermediate process here, because the nuclear energy becomes directly processed into electricity.
The following figure shows the system and the process in general form that I have actually used:
在图中，冷凝器C最初加载到电压Vc上并在关闭开关SW1时被排出，所以所述开关实际上可以是高电流的FET，与纯煤棒相结合，未来核反应将发生，它将发生作为所示环形线圈捕获的所需的β射线，作为简单的线圈捕获辐射，所述环形作为电流的电流变压器作为电流循环通过煤杆，但是除了环形环上最初偏振由VP电池组成的连续源和RP电阻使得围绕环形循环的低电流循环，以保证它们不穿过环形的β光线，而是将其转移到自身上，从而捕获大多数释放的可能能量。
The practical results I have obtained are remarkable, to begin with it is appreciated that the effect of the polarization of current around the toroid hugs the coal bar, when not polarized the collected energy varies until it is at a factor of 3, and with a small system of a bar-toroid, with a maximum dimension of 15 cm, I easily managed to obtain 6KW with the load by all means placed in the output of the toroid, and as the power output of the system is much greater than the input simply refed in the tests and the initial starting battery was removed, this is justified by the enormous energy available because it is like the calculations before referred to which we have 8 KW of useful power per each gram of transformed carbon.
最后强调,尽管是可能的the beta radiation is the practical fuel of the system here it is used completely being transformed into useful energy, unlike the conventional technology where the radiations are a dangerous by-product, in any case in the process of the safety of this system we are due to follow strict safety measures oriented to prevent damages to the health to the builder of this system by radiation exposure either through burns or repeated exposure to the medium or long term exposure, that is to say, during the tests to use suitable sealing, suitable shields that are of lead, concrete or another material and a radioactivity indicator, leaving until the emission level during the tests is at a tolerable level, and by all means for the end assembly of the generating unit sealed, isolated to guarantee during its life utility that there is never is going to exist a radiation leak, even if in case of faults or accidents since this it is a passive system, if the bar is not excited its radioactivity will no longer be present, it is enough to disconnect the feeding without the problem of an explosion, critical mass or a chain reaction, only to take our own precautions to work with radiations with people who activate the circuit, the users only use these calibrated activated systems and they don’t mention it and do not have to worry.
Conclusion:
The fact that conventional nuclear technology is so complex, expensive, dangerous and damages ecological systems seems to be something more than an accident of history, that is to say, all we know that from a sample of history that such technology wanted to be used to make a nuclear pump and all the pursuit oriented to that without fully accounting for the expenses involved and it moved forward as rapidly as possible, it is very probable the scientists who worked in those projects knew of all this but given the circumstances to make something possible or to pressures they received and the idea that anyone could simultaneously develop the technology that we today now call nuclear energy, I do not want to propose that people who use this technology are mistaken or making expenses at the cost of others, I only want to show the light of this evidence that anyone can verify on their own that nuclear technology could be today in our houses, impelling our automobiles, airplanes and spaceships without the contamination fear or damage to the ecology when anyone can have a system of these for their own use, coal abounds in our planet and is an inexhaustible and limitless source of energy.
Original Article: http://econuclear.tk/
